Automated drug discovery offers significant potential for accelerating the development of novel therapeutics by substituting labor-intensive human workflows with machine-driven processes. However, molecules generated by artificial intelligence may unintentionally infringe on existing patents, posing legal and financial risks that impede the full automation of drug discovery pipelines. This paper introduces PatentFinder, a novel multi-agent and tool-enhanced intelligence system that can accurately and comprehensively evaluate small molecules for patent infringement. PatentFinder features five specialized agents that collaboratively analyze patent claims and molecular structures with heuristic and model-based tools, generating interpretable infringement reports. To support systematic evaluation, we curate MolPatent-240, a benchmark dataset tailored for patent infringement assessment algorithms. On this benchmark, PatentFinder outperforms baseline methods that rely solely on large language models or specialized chemical tools, achieving a 13.8% improvement in F1-score and a 12% increase in accuracy. Additionally, PatentFinder autonomously generates detailed and interpretable patent infringement reports, showcasing enhanced accuracy and improved interpretability. The high accuracy and interpretability of PatentFinder make it a valuable and reliable tool for automating patent infringement assessments, offering a practical solution for integrating patent protection analysis into the drug discovery pipeline.

Modern research increasingly relies on automated methods to assist researchers. An example of this is Optical Chemical Structure Recognition (OCSR), which aids chemists in retrieving information about chemicals from large amounts of documents. Markush structures are chemical structures that cannot be parsed correctly by OCSR and cause errors. The focus of this research was to propose and test a novel method for classifying Markush structures. Within this method, a comparison was made between fixed-feature extraction and end-to-end learning (CNN). The end-to-end method performed significantly better than the fixed-feature method, achieving 0.928 (0.035 SD) Macro F1 compared to the fixed-feature method's 0.701 (0.052 SD). Because of the nature of the experiment, these figures are a lower bound and can be improved further. These results suggest that Markush structures can be filtered out effectively and accurately using the proposed method. When implemented into OCSR pipelines, this method can improve their performance and use to other researchers.